Method guide · TPM and maintenance
What is a CMMS? Computerized maintenance management systems, and how maintenance and CI teams use one
Short answer
A CMMS (computerized maintenance management system) is software that holds a plant's maintenance records in one place: the asset list, work orders, preventive maintenance schedules, spare parts and each machine's repair history. It tells the maintenance team what to do next and shows what the machines have cost in downtime and parts.
CMMS stands for computerized maintenance management system. Maintenance planners, technicians, supervisors and the storeroom use it every day: requests come in as work orders, preventive maintenance (PM) falls due on a date or a meter reading, parts are reserved and issued, and every closed job adds to the asset's history. That history is where MTBF, MTTR, PM compliance and the breakdown Pareto come from, which is why continuous improvement teams use the same data. CMMS software, a CMMS program and a CMMS system all mean the same thing.
Last reviewed:
What is a CMMS? The meaning in plain terms
CMMS stands for computerized maintenance management system. Before one, a plant's maintenance runs on a whiteboard, a job book, a spreadsheet of PM due dates and the memory of the senior technician. A CMMS puts the same things into one database: every machine with an asset number, every job raised against it, every PM with its interval, every part on the storeroom shelf, and who did what, when, and how long it took.
The work order is the unit of everything. A breakdown, a PM, a request from an operator, a small modification: each becomes a work order against one asset, with a priority, a craft, an estimate, the parts it needs and, once closed, the hours spent, the parts used and what was found. Reports, schedules and the asset history are all built from closed work orders, so the CMMS is only as good as the work orders the team writes.
| Record | What it holds | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Asset | Asset number, location, parent in the asset tree, maker and model, criticality, manuals | CP-01 case packer, Line 3, criticality A |
| Work order | Asset, type, priority, description, craft, estimate, status, hours, parts, findings, failure codes | WO for a vacuum fault on CP-01, priority 2, mechanical, 1 hour |
| PM task | Asset, task list with limits, trigger (calendar or meter), interval, estimate, parts kit | Replace vacuum cups on CP-01 every 250,000 cycles |
| Meter | Running hours, cycles or units, entered by hand or fed from another system | Compressor 2 hour meter, read every Monday |
| Part | Part number, bin location, stock on hand, reorder point, maximum, supplier, which assets use it | Inlet filter for compressor 2, bin B4, 3 on hand |
| History | Every closed work order on the asset, in date order | Every repair and PM on CP-01 since it was installed |
The letters CMMS are also used for a maintenance management certification for people. This page is about the software.
What a CMMS does: the core functions
Products differ in screens and extras, but almost every CMMS covers the same seven jobs.
- 1
Asset register
The list of everything maintained, arranged as a tree: site, area, line, machine, component. The tree decides how costs and downtime roll up, so a fault on the case packer's vacuum pump counts against the pump, the case packer and Line 3 at once.
- 2
Work requests and work orders
Anyone allowed can raise a request (an operator, a supervisor, a safety walk). Maintenance reviews it, turns it into a work order with a priority, and tracks it through to close. The open list is the maintenance backlog.
- 3
Preventive maintenance scheduling
Each PM task has a trigger and an interval. The CMMS raises the PM work order when the date or the meter reading comes round, early enough to plan it. The preventive maintenance guide covers how to set the intervals.
- 4
Planning and scheduling
A planner adds the job steps, parts, permits and time to each work order, then loads next week's jobs against the hours each craft has. Planned versus scheduled maintenance explains the two jobs.
- 5
Spare parts and the storeroom
Parts are linked to the assets that use them, reserved against work orders, issued from stock and reordered when stock falls to the reorder point. The critical spare parts list is the paper version for the parts that stop a line.
- 6
Mobile work
Technicians see their jobs, the asset history and the procedure on a phone or tablet at the machine, and close the job there with the hours, parts, readings and photos. Closing at the machine is what keeps the record accurate.
- 7
History and reports
Every closed job adds to the asset's history. From it come MTBF, MTTR, downtime by asset and by cause, PM compliance, backlog in hours, and maintenance cost per asset.
How a work order moves through a CMMS
Most CMMS products move a work order through the same states, whatever they call them. The names below are common ones; the order matters more than the labels.
How a work order moves through a CMMS
- 1Anyone
Requested
- 2Supervisor
Approved and prioritised
- 3Planner
Planned
- 4Planner
Scheduled
- 5Technician
In progress
- 6Technician
Closed with hours, parts and codes
Closed jobs feed the history: MTBF, MTTR, the breakdown Pareto and the PM intervals
- 1
Requested
Someone reports a problem or the CMMS raises a PM. A good request names the asset, what is wrong and what the person saw or heard, ideally with a photo.
- 2
Approved and prioritised
A supervisor or planner checks it is real, not a duplicate, and sets the priority. A safety hazard or a line stopped goes straight to a technician; most jobs wait for planning.
- 3
Planned
The planner writes the steps, picks the craft, estimates the hours, reserves the parts and notes any permit or lockout. The maintenance job plan template shows what a full plan holds.
- 4
Scheduled
The job gets a date and a technician, inside a downtime window agreed with production. The weekly maintenance schedule loads the week against each craft's hours.
- 5
In progress
The technician does the work and records time as it is spent, not from memory at the end of the shift.
- 6
Closed
The technician records hours, parts, readings, what was found and the failure codes (what failed, why, what was done). Anything found that could not be fixed becomes a new work order. A supervisor checks the close-out before it counts.
Breakdowns skip planning: the job goes from request to a technician at once and is planned after the fact, with the codes added at close. That is fine for the emergency, but a plant where most work orders skip planning is running on breakdowns, and the planned maintenance percentage in its reports will show it. The maintenance work order form has the same fields on paper.
A PM workflow in a CMMS, followed in numbers
This example is illustrative. Compressor 2 serves a packaging line that runs 80 hours a week. Its inlet filter is changed every 2,000 running hours. The last change was at 14,000 hours on the meter, so the next is due at 16,000. The CMMS is set to raise the PM work order 100 running hours early, at 15,900, so the planner has time to kit the parts.
| Week | What happens | Meter (hours) | Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Operator enters the Monday reading. Not due yet. | 15,660 | 16,000 - 15,660 = 340 hours to go |
| 2 | Monday reading entered | 15,740 | 15,660 + 80 |
| 3 | Monday reading entered | 15,820 | 15,740 + 80 |
| 4 | Monday reading reaches the trigger. The CMMS raises the PM work order and reserves one filter. | 15,900 | 15,820 + 80; 100 hours left, 100 / 80 = 1.25 weeks of running |
| 5 | Planned into Monday's start-up window. Done in 30 minutes, filter issued, work order closed with the reading. | 15,980 | 15,900 + 80; 20 hours inside the 2,000 hour limit |
Check the whole run the other way: 15,660 + 4 x 80 = 15,980, and 15,980 is 1,980 hours after the last change at 14,000, under the 2,000 hour interval.
Three more records change when the work order closes. The next due point is set: on a floating schedule it counts from the reading at completion, 15,980 + 2,000 = 17,980; on a fixed schedule it stays at 16,000 + 2,000 = 18,000. The preventive maintenance guide explains when each fits.
The storeroom changes too. The filter has a reorder point of 2 and a maximum of 4. Stock was 3; issuing one leaves 2, which is the reorder point, so the CMMS suggests ordering 4 - 2 = 2 filters. Check: 2 on hand + 2 on order = 4, the maximum.
And the technician noticed the condensate drain valve was sticking. That is not part of the PM, so it goes in as its own corrective work order, priority 3, planned for the next window. Writing it down is the point: a finding that stays in the technician's head comes back as a breakdown.
What the history gives you: MTBF, MTTR and the breakdown Pareto
Once a year of work orders is closed with honest hours and codes, the CMMS can answer questions nobody could answer from a whiteboard. This example is illustrative. Over 4,000 running hours, compressor 2 had three breakdowns, repaired in 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 hours.
| Measure | Formula | Result | Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTBF (mean time between failures) | Running hours / failures = 4,000 / 3 | 1,333 hours | 3 x 1,333.3 = 3,999.9, which is 4,000 after rounding |
| MTTR (mean time to repair) | Repair hours / repairs = (1.5 + 2.5 + 3.5) / 3 | 2.5 hours | 3 x 2.5 = 7.5 = 1.5 + 2.5 + 3.5 |
| PMs due and done on time | 2 filter PMs due, 2 done inside the window | 100% PM compliance | 2 / 2 |
The [MTBF and MTTR calculator](/tools/mtbf-mttr-calculator) does these sums from a downtime log, and the [maintenance KPI tracker](/templates/maintenance-kpi-tracker) keeps them per asset by month. A PM compliance of 100% with three breakdowns a year says the plan is followed; it does not say the plan is right.
The same history, summed across a line, gives the breakdown Pareto. This example is illustrative: one quarter of breakdown work orders on a packaging line.
| Asset | Breakdown work orders | Downtime hours | Share of hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case packer | 9 | 14.0 | 14.0 / 25.0 = 56% |
| Filler | 4 | 6.5 | 26% |
| Conveyor | 5 | 3.0 | 12% |
| Stretch wrapper | 2 | 1.5 | 6% |
| Total | 20 | 25.0 | 100% |
Check: 9 + 4 + 5 + 2 = 20 work orders and 14.0 + 6.5 + 3.0 + 1.5 = 25.0 hours; 56 + 26 + 12 + 6 = 100. The conveyor has more work orders than the filler but half the hours, which is why the Pareto is drawn on hours, not counts. The [Pareto chart maker](/tools/pareto-chart-maker) draws it from a table like this.
Breakdown hours by asset for one quarter, from closed work orders, as a Pareto chart
Example numbers- Case packer: 14, 56% of the total, cumulative 56%.
- Filler: 6.5, 26% of the total, cumulative 82%.
- Conveyor: 3, 12% of the total, cumulative 94%.
- Stretch wrapper: 1.5, 6% of the total, cumulative 100%.
Bars for downtime hours: case packer 14.0, filler 6.5, conveyor 3.0 and stretch wrapper 1.5, with the case packer at 56 percent of the 25 hours.
How maintenance and CI teams use a CMMS
Maintenance uses the CMMS to run the week: what is open, what is due, who is on it, which parts are short. A continuous improvement team uses the same records to choose and prove improvements, and the two uses need the same thing: work orders closed with real hours and real failure codes.
| Role | Uses the CMMS to |
|---|---|
| Technician | See the day's jobs, read the asset history and procedure at the machine, record hours, parts, readings and findings |
| Planner and scheduler | Turn requests into planned jobs, kit parts, load the week against each craft's hours |
| Maintenance supervisor | Set priorities, check close-outs, watch backlog and PM compliance |
| Storeroom | Issue parts against work orders, keep reorder points, find parts nobody has used in years |
| Operator and line leader | Raise requests from the line, see whether their request has been picked up |
| CI or reliability engineer | Pull the breakdown Pareto, find repeat failures, check that a countermeasure moved MTBF |
| Plant manager | Read maintenance cost, downtime by line and the share of planned work |
Back to the line in the Pareto above. The case packer is 56% of breakdown hours. Inside its 9 work orders the failure codes split into vacuum cups (5 work orders, 8.0 hours), sensor faults (2, 3.5 hours) and jams (2, 2.5 hours): 5 + 2 + 2 = 9 and 8.0 + 3.5 + 2.5 = 14.0. Vacuum cups alone are 8.0 / 25.0 = 32% of the line's breakdown hours. That is the problem to take to a root cause analysis.
Say the team finds that the cup PM is still on a 5-week calendar interval set when the line ran two shifts, and the line now runs three, so the cups wear out before the PM comes round. The countermeasure is a change in the CMMS: the trigger moves from the calendar to the cycle count. The check is in the CMMS too: vacuum cup work orders and the case packer's MTBF over the next quarter. The reduce machine downtime guide covers the full loop.
None of this works if a third of the work orders say "Other" or "Fixed". If the CI team wants the data, it has to help maintenance keep the failure code list short and clear and check a sample of close-outs each week.
CMMS vs EAM vs ERP vs spreadsheets
The four get confused because they overlap. The difference is scope: how much of the asset's life and the business each one covers.
| System | What it covers | Fits when |
|---|---|---|
| Spreadsheet and paper | A list of assets and PM due dates, paper job cards, a notebook of repairs | One small site with a handful of PMs and one person who owns the file |
| CMMS | Assets, work orders, PM scheduling, parts, labour and maintenance history for the sites that run it | Maintenance at one or a few plants is the problem to solve |
| EAM (enterprise asset management) | Everything a CMMS covers plus the rest of the asset's life: purchase, capital planning, depreciation, replacement and retirement, across many sites | Asset-heavy companies that plan capital and lifecycle cost across a network of sites |
| ERP maintenance module | Maintenance orders and plans inside the ERP, sharing purchasing, stores, cost centres and finance | The company already runs on the ERP and wants maintenance cost booked there directly |
| MES | Production orders, what the line made, quality and genealogy | Not a maintenance system; it may send machine counts or downtime to the CMMS |
Many CMMS products now sell EAM features and many EAM products are bought only for their CMMS part, so ask what you will use rather than which label the vendor uses.
People often ask whether SAP is a CMMS. It is an ERP, and its plant maintenance module covers much of what a CMMS does (equipment records, maintenance plans and orders) inside the ERP, so some plants use it as their maintenance system and others run a separate CMMS that passes costs and part orders to the ERP.
When a spreadsheet stops being enough
- PMs are missed because nobody opened the file that week, and nobody finds out until the breakdown.
- Two people keep two copies of the PM list and they no longer agree.
- You cannot say how many hours of work are waiting, or which machine broke down most last quarter.
- Parts run out because nobody knew the last one was used.
- An auditor or customer asks for a machine's maintenance record and it takes a day to put together.
Moving from Excel to one system covers what to clean up before you move any list into software, and why to digitize equipment maintenance covers the case for moving off paper.
How to choose a CMMS
Choose on how your technicians will use it on a night shift, not on the feature list. Run a short trial on one line with your own assets and a month of your own work orders, and score each product on the questions below.
| Question | Why it matters | How to test it in a trial |
|---|---|---|
| Will technicians close jobs at the machine? | If closing takes longer than writing on a card, the history stays empty | Have a technician close five real jobs on a phone, with gloves on, and time it |
| Can operators raise a request in under a minute? | Requests that are hard to raise go back to the radio and the whiteboard | Have an operator raise one from the line with a photo |
| Does PM scheduling match how your machines wear? | You need calendar and meter triggers, fixed and floating dates, and an early-warning lead | Load one meter-based PM and one calendar PM and watch them come due |
| Can you import your asset tree and PM list? | Retyping hundreds of assets is where projects stall | Import one line from your spreadsheet and check the parents and criticality came across |
| Are failure codes simple to pick and easy to report on? | The breakdown Pareto and MTBF depend on them | Close ten jobs with codes, then pull downtime by asset and by cause |
| What does it need to talk to? | Purchasing and finance in the ERP, meter readings or downtime from production systems | Ask for the integration you need shown working, not on a roadmap slide |
| Cloud or on your own servers? | Cloud needs no local IT and works off site; on-premise suits sites with strict network rules | Ask your IT team which they will support before the shortlist |
| What will it cost in total? | Licences are priced per user, per site or per asset; setup, data loading and training come on top | Price the users you will actually have, including occasional requesters |
| Can you get your data out? | You may change systems in five years | Export the full history of one asset to a spreadsheet |
The maintenance strategy selector and the equipment criticality analysis are worth doing before the shortlist: they tell you which assets need PM in the system first and which can run to failure.
CMMS implementation: start with one line
Most CMMS projects that fail do so on data and habits, not software. Go live on one line, get the records honest there, then spread it.
- 1
Clean the asset list
One asset number per machine, a naming rule, a location and a parent in the tree. Add the utilities that stop the line: compressors, chillers, dust extraction.
- 2
Rank criticality
Score each asset on safety, quality, output and cost. Load PMs for the A class first.
- 3
Load PMs with limits
Each task written as an action and a limit, with its trigger and interval. Do not load a PM list nobody can explain; review it as you load it.
- 4
Set a short failure code list
A few codes for what failed, why and what was done, agreed with the technicians. No "Other" without a note.
- 5
Link the critical spares
Start with the parts that stop the line, linked to their assets, with a reorder point and a maximum.
- 6
Train by doing, then review weekly
Technicians close real jobs in the system from day one. Each week the supervisor checks a sample of close-outs, the backlog and PM compliance with the team, and fixes the data at the source.
Spread to the next line only when the first line's work orders are closed with hours and codes as a habit. The maintenance KPI tracker is a simple way to show the first line's numbers to the rest of the plant.
Where LeanSuite fits next to a CMMS
LeanSuite is not a CMMS and does not replace one. It handles the operator side of maintenance and works alongside the maintenance system a plant already has: when an operator tags an abnormality, or a scheduled PM comes due, LeanSuite creates the work order and routes it to the maintenance team, and a tag can carry the work-order number from your CMMS. Operators run their CILR checks from visual checklists, and when the same breakdown comes back it can be escalated into a kaizen or A3 project. Asset records, parts and the maintenance history stay in your CMMS.
See autonomous maintenance, professional maintenance tags and TPM software, which sets out where a CMMS ends and operator-led TPM begins.
Common CMMS mistakes
- Buying the CMMS to fix a planning problem. Software stores the plan; it does not write it. Without someone planning and scheduling, the CMMS becomes a faster job book.
- Loading every old PM as it is. Tasks without limits and intervals nobody can explain go into the new system and keep failing there.
- Work orders closed with "Fixed". No hours, no codes, no findings, and a year later no MTBF and no Pareto.
- Breakdowns never entered. The technician fixes it, the line restarts, and the CMMS shows a machine with no failures.
- An asset tree built for accounting, not the floor. If the tree does not match how the line is laid out, downtime will not roll up to the line that lost it.
- Making requests hard. If an operator has to log in on a shared PC in the office, problems go back to the radio and never reach the history.
- Treating PM compliance as the goal. A high number with breakdowns still rising means the tasks are wrong; read it next to MTBF.
Autonomous Maintenance
Run the operator side of maintenance in LeanSuite
LeanSuite handles the operator side of maintenance and works alongside your CMMS rather than replacing it.
Go deeper
This page is the short version. These guides cover each part in full.
- Why You Should Digitize Equipment MaintenanceThe case for moving maintenance off paper and whiteboards, in more depth than the section here.
- Maintenance KPIs: What to Measure and WhyMTBF, MTTR, PM compliance, planned maintenance percentage and the other measures a CMMS reports.
- The Difference Between Planned and Scheduled MaintenanceThe planner's two jobs: preparing the work order, then fitting it into the week.
- Types of Maintenance Workers: Technician, Engineer, PlannerThe roles that use a CMMS every day and what each one is responsible for.
- Root Cause Analysis for Equipment Failures: Methods and FrameworkWhat to do with the repeat failures the CMMS history shows.
All our articles on this subject are in the tpm and maintenance topic.
Free templates and tools
- Work order template for maintenanceA work order template for maintenance: one form per job from request to handback, and a log of response, completion and backlog by priority.
- Preventive maintenance checklist templateA PM checklist per machine with readings and sign-off, and a PM schedule that works out the next due date.
- Weekly maintenance schedule templateNext week's maintenance jobs, scheduled only when ready, loaded against each craft's hours by day, with schedule compliance and break-ins at week end.
- Maintenance job plan templateOne job planned on one sheet: steps and craft hours, parts checked against stock, tools, lockout and permits, documents, a ready check for the schedule, and technician feedback.
- Critical spare parts list and stocking levelsAssets ranked by consequence, each part classed and given a stocking policy, and min and max worked out from usage and lead time, with the downtime each stock-out would cost.
- Equipment criticality analysisAssets scored 1 to 5 on six criteria with your own weights, ranked and sorted into classes A, B and C with a safety override and a suggested maintenance strategy.
- Maintenance KPI trackerMTBF, MTTR, availability and PM compliance per asset and month, plant figures from the totals, planned maintenance % and backlog in weeks.
- MTBF and MTTR calculatorMean time between failures, mean time to repair and availability from operating time, failures and repair time.
- Maintenance strategy selectorAnswer the RCM questions for one failure mode and get the maintenance strategy, the reasoning and the check or test interval.
- Pareto chart makerPaste categories and counts: sorted bars, cumulative percentage line and the vital few at the 80% line, as a PNG or SVG.
- Downtime cost calculatorWhat an hour, an event and a year of unplanned downtime cost, from lost output, idle labour, scrap and overtime.
Key terms
- Computerized maintenance management system (CMMS)
- Work order
- Preventive maintenance (PM)
- Maintenance backlog
- PM compliance
- Planned maintenance percentage (PMP)
- Mean time between failures (MTBF)
- Mean time to repair (MTTR)
- Critical spare parts
- Reactive maintenance
- Total productive maintenance (TPM)
Doing this in LeanSuite
Autonomous Maintenance
Rolls out visual CILR (clean, inspect, lube, retighten) checklists so operators catch small abnormalities before they cause downtime.
See Autonomous MaintenanceCILR Checklists
Build visual CILR checklists so operators clean, inspect, lubricate and re-tighten on schedule and catch problems before they become breakdowns.
See CILR ChecklistsProfessional maintenance tags
Professional maintenance tags in LeanSuite turn radio calls and firefighting into work orders every technician can see, own and close out.
See Professional maintenance tags
See it on your own lines
Bring the problem you are working on to a 45-minute demo. Or look around with sample data first, or pilot LeanSuite on your own lines for 90 days, with the setup done by our team.
FAQ
Questions about cMMS
Computerized maintenance management system. The software holds a plant's maintenance records in one place: the asset list, work orders, preventive maintenance schedules, spare parts and the repair history of each machine.
Maintenance teams use a CMMS to raise and track work orders, schedule preventive maintenance by date or meter reading, plan and schedule the week's jobs, reserve and reorder spare parts, and keep each asset's history. Managers and CI teams use the same history to work out MTBF, MTTR, PM compliance, backlog and downtime by asset and cause.
A compressor's inlet filter is due every 2,000 running hours. An operator enters the hour meter reading each Monday; when it reaches 1,900 hours since the last change, the CMMS raises the PM work order and reserves a filter. The technician changes it, closes the job with the time, the part and the reading, and the CMMS sets the next due point and suggests reordering filters when stock reaches the reorder point.
A CMMS manages maintenance work: assets, work orders, PM, parts and history. An EAM (enterprise asset management) system covers that plus the rest of the asset's life, such as purchase, capital planning, depreciation and replacement, usually across many sites. A plant whose problem is day-to-day maintenance usually needs a CMMS; a company planning asset lifecycle cost across a network may need an EAM.
It is an ERP. The plant maintenance module in SAP covers much of what a CMMS does, such as equipment records, maintenance plans and maintenance orders, inside the ERP. Some plants use it as their maintenance system; others run a separate CMMS that passes costs and part orders to the ERP.
Yes. All three mean the computerized maintenance management system itself. Some people also use "CMMS program" for the way a plant runs maintenance with it: the PM list, the work order rules and the weekly review.
Run a short trial on one line with your own assets and work orders. Check that technicians can close a job at the machine quickly, that operators can raise a request in under a minute, that PM supports calendar and meter triggers, that your asset tree and PM list import cleanly, that failure codes give you downtime by asset and cause, that it connects to the systems you need, and that you can export your data.
Prices vary widely. Cloud CMMS products are usually priced per user per month, sometimes per site or per asset, and on-premise products as a licence plus yearly support. Setup, loading your asset and PM data, and training are often the larger cost in the first year, so price the users you will really have and ask what is included in setup.
Not always at the start. A small site with a short PM list can run from a spreadsheet and paper job cards. The signs it is time for a CMMS are missed PMs, two copies of the PM list that disagree, parts running out unexpectedly, and not being able to say which machine broke down most last quarter.
No. LeanSuite is not a CMMS and does not replace one. It handles the operator side of maintenance and works alongside your CMMS: when an operator tags an abnormality or a scheduled PM comes due, it creates the work order and routes it to the maintenance team, and a tag can carry the work-order number from your CMMS.
Related guides and tools
- Reliability-centred maintenance: deciding which PM tasks belong in the CMMS
- Total productive maintenance: the eight pillars and autonomous maintenance
- Preventive maintenance: the types, a PM schedule worked out in numbers and PM compliance
- TPM software: where a CMMS ends and operator-led TPM begins, pillar by pillar
- Reduce machine downtime: from the downtime log to a countermeasure that holds
- MaintainX alternatives: CMMS tools and where LeanSuite fits
More method guides
- The 6 Ms of production
- Poka-yoke
- Model area 90-day plans
- Moving from Excel to one system
- Reducing machine downtime: a worked month
- Andon
- Cycle time vs lead time, worked through
- Root cause analysis
- How many operators a line needs
- Reducing scrap and rework: a worked month
- Unsafe acts and unsafe conditions
- Just culture
- Stop-work authority
- Material review board (MRB)
- Nonconformance and NCRs
- Problem solving methods
- Quad chart
- OEE calculation
- Quality assurance vs quality control
- SOP meaning and format
- Job hazard analysis
- Near miss reporting
- Fishbone diagram
- Pareto chart
- Histogram
- Control chart
- What is a gemba walk
- What is lead time
- What is operational excellence
- How to improve product quality
- Preventive vs predictive maintenance
- Kanban
- FMEA
- PDSA cycle
- Safety moments
- Just-in-time manufacturing
- Kaizen
- 5S
- Total quality management (TQM)
- CAPA (corrective and preventive action)
- Layered process audit (LPA)
- Lean tools
- Lockout tagout (LOTO)
- A3 problem solving
- Preventive maintenance
- APQP
- High reliability organization (HRO)
- Manufacturing KPIs
- Quality metrics
- Practical problem solving
- Risk assessment
- Production efficiency
- Total productive maintenance (TPM)
- Reliability-centered maintenance (RCM)
Or browse the topics, the full library and the lean glossary.
Rather see it on your own problem?
Bring the problem you are stuck on, and we will show you on a call how LeanSuite handles it.

