Pacemaker process
The pacemaker process is the one process in a value stream that receives the customer schedule. Processes upstream of it are replenished by pull from supermarkets, and material downstream of it moves in continuous flow or a FIFO lane, so its pace sets the pace of the whole stream. It is usually the last step of continuous flow before the customer, and the place where the product mix is leveled.
Related: Value stream mapping (VSM), Heijunka, Supermarket, Pull system, Takt time
Paperless manufacturing
Paperless manufacturing is running and reporting the daily work of a plant without paper forms, checklists and documents: checks, logs, audits and instructions are filled in and read on phones, tablets or screens. The data is entered once where the work happens, so the people who act on it do not wait for paper to be collected, typed up or filed. A common way to start is form by form, beginning with the forms that take the most time or wait longest before anyone reads them.
Related: Digital work instructions, 8 wastes of lean (DOWNTIME), Value-added time, Standard work
Pareto analysis
Pareto analysis ranks problems or causes by their impact, usually as a bar chart sorted from largest to smallest with a cumulative percentage line. It rests on the 80/20 rule of thumb that a few causes account for most of the effect. Teams use it to decide which defects, downtime reasons, or losses to work on first.
Related: Root cause analysis (RCA), Cost of poor quality (COPQ), Check sheet, Seven basic quality tools
Parts per million (PPM)
In quality, parts per million (PPM) is the number of defective parts for every million made, shipped or received: defective parts divided by total parts, times 1,000,000. Eight rejects in 10,000 parts received is 800 PPM. It is the usual way to state supplier and customer quality, because percentages become hard to read once defect rates are small.
Related: Supplier scorecard, First pass yield (FPY), Six Sigma
Payback period
The payback period is how long a project takes to earn back its investment: the investment divided by the annual net benefit, which is the yearly saving or extra income minus any yearly running costs. A $120,000 machine that returns $40,000 a year net pays back in 3 years. It is quick to work out and easy to explain, but it ignores the time value of money and everything after the payback date, which is why capital requests usually show NPV as well.
Related: Net present value (NPV), Internal rate of return (IRR), Capital expenditure (CapEx), Cost-benefit analysis, Hard and soft savings
PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act)
PDCA, short for Plan-Do-Check-Act, is the four-step cycle behind continuous improvement. You plan a change based on what you expect it to do, try it on a small scale, check the results against the expectation, and act by standardizing what worked or starting another cycle. It is also known as the Deming or Shewhart cycle, and some practitioners use PDSA, with Study in place of Check.
Related: DMAIC, A3 problem solving, Kaizen
People, process, technology (PPT)
People, process, technology (PPT) is a framework for planning and checking a change by looking at three elements together: the people who do the work, the processes that set how it is done and the technology that supports them. The point is balance: a new tool adds little if the people are not trained or the process was not changed to fit it, so the weakest element limits the result. It is also called the golden triangle.
Related: Lean readiness assessment, Paperless manufacturing, Digital work instructions, Nemawashi
Pitch
Pitch is the time a process needs to make one container of product: takt time × pack-out quantity. With a takt time of 120 seconds and 15 pieces to a container, the pitch is 30 minutes. Pitch sets the interval for releasing and collecting work, for example how often a kanban is taken from a heijunka box.
Related: Takt time, Heijunka, Kanban, EPEI (every part every interval)
Planned downtime
Planned downtime is time a machine or line is deliberately stopped on a schedule, for example for planned maintenance, changeovers, cleaning, trials, or breaks. Because it is known in advance, parts, people, and the production plan can be prepared for it. Plants set their own rules for which planned stops count against OEE, so the rule should be written down and applied consistently.
Related: Unplanned downtime, Planned maintenance, Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)
Planned maintenance
Planned maintenance is maintenance work that is prepared in advance: the job is defined, and the steps, parts, tools, skills, and time it needs are worked out before it starts. It covers preventive and predictive tasks as well as repairs that can be prepared ahead of time. In TPM, planned maintenance is also the pillar through which the maintenance team builds a proactive program.
Related: Scheduled maintenance, Preventive maintenance (PM), Eight pillars of TPM
Planned maintenance percentage (PMP)
Planned maintenance percentage (PMP) is the share of maintenance hours spent on work that was planned before it was done: planned hours ÷ total maintenance hours. Planned work includes preventive and predictive tasks, inspections and repairs scheduled ahead; the rest is reactive work after a breakdown. Plants draw the line between the two differently, so the definition should be written down next to the number.
Related: Planned maintenance, Reactive maintenance, PM compliance, Maintenance backlog
PM compliance
PM compliance is the share of preventive maintenance tasks due in a period that were done on time: PMs done on time ÷ PMs due. Many plants count a PM as on time if it is done inside a grace window they set, such as 10% of the interval, and count late PMs as done but not on time. A falling PM compliance is often the first sign that breakdown work is crowding out planned work.
Related: Preventive maintenance (PM), Planned maintenance percentage (PMP), Mean time between failures (MTBF), Maintenance backlog
Points-based reward system
A points-based reward system gives employees a set number of points for each action it recognizes and lets them save the points and redeem them for rewards they choose from a catalogue. The workplace sets the points per action and per prize, so the rules are visible and small, frequent recognition adds up. Points earned and not yet redeemed are a future cost to budget for.
Related: Kaizen teian
Poka-yoke
Poka-yoke, Japanese for mistake-proofing, is any device or method that prevents an error from being made, or makes it obvious at once so it cannot become a defect. Examples include fixtures that only accept a part the right way round, sensors that stop a machine when a step is skipped, and connectors that cannot be mated incorrectly. It builds quality in at the source instead of relying on inspection.
Related: Jidoka, Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), Poka-yoke types, Quality at the source
Poka-yoke types
Poka-yoke devices are commonly grouped into three types by how they catch an error. Contact methods check a physical feature of the part, such as its shape, size, or position; fixed-value methods check that the right number of parts or actions has been completed; and motion-step methods check that the steps of a process were done in the right order. Each type can either prevent the error or warn when it happens.
Related: Poka-yoke, Quality at the source, Jidoka
Pre-shipment inspection
A pre-shipment inspection is the last check of an order before it leaves the building: the right part and revision, the right quantity, released lots, labels in the customer’s format, packaging as specified, complete paperwork and photos, followed by a release by an authorized person. Final inspection checks that the product meets its specification; pre-shipment inspection checks that the right product is packed, labeled and documented correctly. It catches the complaints that are not about the part itself, such as wrong quantities, mixed lots and missing certificates.
Related: Acceptance quality limit (AQL), Quality at the source, Poka-yoke, Check sheet
Predictive maintenance (PdM)
Predictive maintenance (PdM) schedules maintenance based on the measured condition of the equipment rather than on the calendar. Readings such as vibration, temperature, oil analysis, or current draw are monitored for signs of deterioration, and the repair is planned before failure is expected. It avoids both unexpected breakdowns and replacing parts that still have useful life.
Related: Preventive maintenance (PM), Reliability-centered maintenance (RCM), Mean time between failures (MTBF)
Prevention-appraisal-failure (PAF) model
The prevention-appraisal-failure (PAF) model sorts the cost of quality into four categories: prevention costs such as training and error-proofing, appraisal costs such as inspection and testing, internal failure costs such as scrap and rework, and external failure costs such as returns and warranty claims. The two failure categories make up the cost of poor quality. Spending more on prevention usually reduces the other three.
Related: Cost of poor quality (COPQ), First pass yield (FPY)
Preventive maintenance (PM)
Preventive maintenance (PM) is maintenance done at set intervals of time or usage, such as monthly or every set number of running hours, to keep equipment from failing. Typical tasks are inspections, lubrication, adjustments, and replacing wear parts before they fail. It reduces breakdowns but can replace parts earlier than needed, which is why it is often combined with predictive maintenance.
Related: Predictive maintenance (PdM), Planned maintenance, Reactive maintenance, Computerized maintenance management system (CMMS)
Prioritization matrix
A prioritization matrix is a grid for ranking improvement ideas or problems, most often by impact on one axis and effort on the other. High-impact, low-effort items are done first, high-impact, high-effort items are planned as projects, and low-impact items are simplified or dropped. It turns a long backlog into an agreed order of work.
Related: Pareto analysis, Kaizen
Process capability (Cp, Cpk)
Process capability measures how well a stable process can produce output within its specification limits. Cp compares the width of the tolerance with the spread of the process, (USL − LSL) ÷ 6σ, while Cpk also accounts for centering and is the smaller of (USL − mean) ÷ 3σ and (mean − LSL) ÷ 3σ. A Cpk of 1.33 is a commonly used minimum (a rule of thumb, not a universal standard), and the result is only meaningful when the process is in statistical control.
Related: Statistical process control (SPC), Measurement system analysis (MSA), Six Sigma, Process performance (Pp, Ppk)
Process capacity sheet
A process capacity sheet lists each machine in a process with its manual time, automatic time and tool change time, and works out how many pieces it can make in a shift: available time divided by the time per piece, including each piece's share of the tool changes. It shows which machine limits capacity before the operator's work is designed around it with a combination table.
Related: Standard work combination table, Cycle time, Takt time
Process cycle efficiency (PCE)
Process cycle efficiency (PCE) is the share of a process's lead time spent on value-added work: value-added time ÷ lead time, in the same units. A part with 110 seconds of value-added work and a 17-day lead time has a PCE of about 0.01%. Very low figures are normal in batch production; they show that almost all of the lead time is waiting, which is where improvement should start.
Related: Value-added time, Lead time, Value stream mapping (VSM), Little’s Law
Process flow diagram
A process flow diagram is a drawing of every step a product goes through, in order, from the material coming in to the product going out, using symbols for operations, moves, inspections, delays and storage, with the decisions and rework loops between them. Counting the steps of each kind shows how few of them change the part, and the process FMEA and control plan follow the same steps; in automotive PPAP it is a required element. Unlike a value stream map, it does not show cycle times, inventory between steps or information flow.
Related: Value stream mapping (VSM), Spaghetti diagram, SIPOC diagram, Value-added time, Production part approval process (PPAP)
Process improvement
Process improvement, also called business process improvement (BPI), is the ongoing work of finding, analyzing and improving existing processes so they take less time and go wrong less often. Common methodologies include lean, kaizen, PDCA, 5 Whys, total quality management and Six Sigma, and the one that fits depends on the problem: its size, its cause and the data available.
Related: Kaizen, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act), Six Sigma, Lean manufacturing, Total quality management (TQM), 5 Whys
Pp and Ppk are process performance indices: they use the same formulas as Cp and Cpk, but with the overall standard deviation of every reading, which includes shifts and drift between subgroups, instead of the short-term variation within subgroups. Pp = (USL − LSL) ÷ 6σ, and Ppk is the smaller of (USL − mean) and (mean − LSL), divided by 3σ. When a process is stable Ppk and Cpk are close; a Ppk well below Cpk means the process moves over time, and PPAP initial process studies usually report Ppk.
Related: Process capability (Cp, Cpk), Statistical process control (SPC), Production part approval process (PPAP)
Production part approval process (PPAP)
The production part approval process (PPAP) is how a supplier, mainly in automotive, shows its customer that it understands every requirement for a part and that its production process can make the part to those requirements at the quoted rate. The AIAG PPAP manual lists 18 elements, from the design records, process flow diagram and FMEAs to capability studies and the part submission warrant (PSW), and five submission levels that set what is sent to the customer and what is kept on file. A new submission is usually needed for a new part and for changes such as new tooling, a new material or a move to another site.
Related: Design FMEA (DFMEA), Process flow diagram, Process performance (Pp, Ppk), Measurement system analysis (MSA), Engineering change request (ECR)
Project charter
A project charter is the one-page agreement that starts an improvement project, signed by the sponsor before the analysis begins. It states the business case, the problem in numbers, the goal with a date, the metrics, the scope, the team and the phase milestones. In DMAIC it is the main output of the Define phase and is updated at a tollgate if the data changes the picture.
Related: DMAIC, SIPOC diagram, Critical to quality (CTQ), Six Sigma
Pull system
A pull system is a way of controlling production in which a process makes or moves material only when the next process signals that it has used some, instead of following a forecast-driven schedule (push). The signal can be a kanban card, an empty container or space, or an electronic trigger. Because work is released only as it is consumed, inventory stays capped and overproduction is avoided.
Related: Kanban, Supermarket, Just-in-time (JIT)
Pulse survey
A pulse survey is a short survey, often a dozen or so statements, run at regular intervals to see how people view their work between longer surveys. Because it is short and repeated with the same statements, results can be compared over time and actions checked against the next round.
Back to A–Z