Practical guide · Root cause analysis and problem solving
Fishbone diagram (Ishikawa): how to draw one, read it and turn it into checks
Short answer
A fishbone diagram, also called an Ishikawa or cause-and-effect diagram, sorts the possible causes of one problem into categories such as the 6Ms, drawn as bones leading to the problem at the head. It is a brainstorming map, not proof: each cause is a suspect until checked.
A fishbone diagram puts one problem statement at the head of a spine and draws a bone for each category of cause, usually the 6Ms: Man, Machine, Method, Material, Measurement and Mother Nature. The team adds possible causes to each bone, then picks the few most likely and checks them with data on the floor. The diagram only lists suspects. A cause is confirmed when a check shows the problem follows it, and the 5 Whys then goes deeper on the confirmed one.
Last updated:
What a fishbone diagram is
A fishbone diagram is a picture of every area a problem could come from, drawn so a team looks at all of them before settling on the first explanation that sounds right. The problem sits in a box at the head on the right. A horizontal spine runs to it, and angled bones off the spine carry the categories. Small branches on each bone hold the specific causes the team thinks of. It is named for its shape. It is also called an Ishikawa diagram after Kaoru Ishikawa, the Japanese quality expert who popularised it, and a cause-and-effect diagram after what it shows.
It is one of the seven basic quality tools. It is a way to organise a group's knowledge, so it is only as good as the people in the room and the checks that follow it. For the methods around it, see problem solving methods and the wider root cause analysis guide.
Which categories to put on the bones
The category names are a prompt, not a rule. Pick the set that makes the team think of causes it would otherwise miss.
| Set | Categories | Use it for |
|---|---|---|
| 6Ms | Man, Machine, Method, Material, Measurement, Mother Nature (environment) | Manufacturing defects and stops. The default. See the 6 Ms of production |
| 5Ms | The 6Ms without Measurement | A quick first pass. Measurement is the one most often missed, so add it back if the problem is intermittent |
| 8Ps | Product, Price, Place, Promotion, People, Process, Physical evidence, Performance | Service and marketing problems, not shop floor ones |
| Your own | Names taken from your process steps, such as Mixing, Filling, Capping, Inspection | When the problem sits in one process and the Ms feel generic |
How to make a fishbone diagram in six steps
- 1
Write a specific problem statement
What, where, how big and since when, in one line, with a number. 'Leak test failures on filler line 2 rose from 1% to 6% of bottles since Monday' beats 'quality problems'. A vague head gives a vague diagram. The 5W1H template helps if the team cannot agree on the statement.
- 2
Pick the right people
Four to eight, including the operator who runs the process, maintenance, quality and someone who does not work there every day. Operators know things no data system holds.
- 3
Draw the spine and the category bones
Draw it on a whiteboard, paper or the fishbone board in Lean Studio, or print the fishbone diagram template. Label each bone with its category.
- 4
Brainstorm causes onto each bone
One idea per branch, written as something that could be true ('seal temperature drifts') and not as a verdict. Go around the bones one at a time. Stop criticising ideas during this step.
- 5
Go one level deeper where it helps
For a promising branch, ask what could cause that, and add a sub-branch. Two levels is usually enough. The 5 Whys is the better tool for one chain of cause.
- 6
Choose, check and cross out
Vote for the three to five most likely causes, write the check that would confirm or clear each one, assign an owner and a date, and mark each branch confirmed or cleared when the result is in. A fishbone with no checks beside it has not finished.
Worked example: a leaking cap (illustrative)
This example is made up. A bottling line's leak test failures rose from 1% to 6% of bottles. The team writes the head as 'Leak test failures on filler line 2: 6% since Monday, was 1%' and builds the fishbone below.
| Bone | Possible causes named | Shortlisted check |
|---|---|---|
| Man | New operator on capper; torque set by feel | Compare failures by operator across the last three shifts |
| Machine | Capping head 3 clutch worn; chuck dirty | Count failures by capping head for one shift |
| Method | Torque setting not written down; changeover checklist skipped a step | Compare the torque on the setup sheet with the setting on the machine |
| Material | New cap lot; liner thickness varies | Run 100 caps from the old lot and 100 from the new on the same head |
| Measurement | Leak tester pressure drifts; threshold changed | Test 20 known-good and 20 known-leaking bottles on the tester |
| Mother Nature | Cold morning stiffens liners | Compare failure rate by hour against the room temperature log |
The team runs the checks that cost least. The tester passes all 20 known-good and catches all 20 known-leaking bottles, so Measurement is cleared. Counting failures by capping head for a shift, 24 of the 30 failed bottles came from head 3, which is 80% of the failures from one of six heads. The old and new cap lots both run clean on a good head, so Material is cleared. The torque on head 3 reads lower than on the other five, which points at the worn clutch. The confirmed finding is that head 3 does not hold its torque. A 5 Whys on that finding then asks why the clutch was not caught before it wore, and ends at a missing inspection step in the changeover checklist.
Notice what the fishbone did. It put six areas on the table, so the team did not stop at the new operator, which was the first guess in the room. It was the checks, not the diagram, that found head 3.
Mistakes that make a fishbone useless
| Mistake | What goes wrong | Do this instead |
|---|---|---|
| A vague head | Causes are guesses about different problems | A specific, measured statement agreed before drawing |
| Stopping at the diagram | Opinions are treated as findings | Write a check, an owner and a date for every shortlisted cause |
| Writing people as causes | 'Operator error' ends the search and lets the process off | Ask what let the error happen: training, setup, a missing instruction |
| Only the manager's view | The person who runs the process is not asked | Include the operator and maintenance |
| Every bone filled equally | A hundred causes and no priority | Vote, shortlist and check; leave empty bones empty |
| Using it for a single clear chain | Four bones are filled to look thorough | Use the 5 Whys when there is one chain of cause |
Fishbone, 5 Whys or Pareto: which first
Use a Pareto chart first when you have several problems and need to pick one. Use the fishbone when one problem could come from several areas and the team has to widen its view. Use the 5 Whys when the cause looks like one chain, or to go deeper on a cause the fishbone has confirmed. A fishbone then a 5 Whys is a common pair. For bigger, cross-functional problems the output of the fishbone goes into an A3 or 8D report.
Make one now
Download the fishbone diagram template, which is a printable six-M sheet plus the board in Lean Studio, and the root cause analysis template to keep the checks and the confirmed cause next to it.
Definitions and notes
- The fishbone, cause-and-effect or Ishikawa diagram is one of the seven basic quality tools, attributed to Kaoru Ishikawa (ASQ, "Fishbone diagram"). Sources differ on the exact date and setting of its first use.
- The 6Ms are as on the 6 Ms of production guide. The 8Ps are the service-marketing set; they are named here for comparison only.
- The leaking-cap example, its counts and the cap lots are made up for illustration. They are not from a real plant.
Go deeper
This page is the short version. These guides cover each part in full.
- Fishbone Diagram: A Root Cause Analysis Visual ToolThe full blog guide to the fishbone as a root cause tool, with more on building and reading it.
- Fishbone Diagram Facilitation Techniques for ManufacturingHow to run the session: keeping it specific, drawing out the operators and ending with checks.
- The 6 Ms of ProductionWhat each of the six categories covers and the questions to ask under each bone.
- 5 Whys Root Cause Analysis MethodHow to take a confirmed cause from the fishbone down to the root with the 5 Whys.
All our articles on this subject are in the root cause analysis and problem solving topic.
Free templates and tools
- Fishbone diagram template (6M)A printable six-M fishbone on one landscape sheet, plus the fishbone board in Lean Studio: problem statement at the head, a bone for each M and a table for the causes you will check.
- Root cause analysis templateOne report from problem statement to proof: containment, evidence, analysis, verified causes, actions and the effectiveness check.
- 5 Whys templateA problem statement, a why chain that can branch, evidence for every answer, root causes and countermeasures that are checked.
- 5W1H templateWho, what, when, where, why and how: a problem statement built from checked facts, and an action plan with nothing left open.
- A3 problem solving templateThe standard seven-box A3 from background to follow-up, with a filled-in worked example. PDF and Excel.
- Pareto chart templateA tally sheet, the Pareto by count and by cost with the cumulative line and the 80% cut, and a before and after comparison. Excel sorts and draws it.
- Corrective action request (CAPA) formOne problem from containment to proof the fix worked, with occurrence and escape causes and a closure check that tells you when it can close.
- Fishbone diagram makerName the problem, list causes under the 6M bones, and download the Ishikawa diagram as a PNG or SVG.
- 5 Whys canvasWrite the problem, answer up to five whys, state the root cause and countermeasure, then print the one-page canvas.
- Lean method navigatorSix questions about one problem, then the lean method to start with, the two that follow, why each fits, five steps for Monday and what it will not solve.
Doing this in LeanSuite
Lean Studio
LeanSuite's whiteboard for lean teams, with 30 ready-made boards including the fishbone, 5 Whys, A3 and 8D.
See Lean StudioAI Root Cause Analysis
Describe a problem, answer the AI's questions, and get the likely root causes and an action plan.
See AI Root Cause AnalysisQuality Improvement
Log quality issues from the floor, trace each one to its root cause and follow the corrective action through to closure.
See Quality Improvement
Open this board in LeanSuite
Fishbone board is one of the 30 ready-made boards in Lean Studio, LeanSuite's whiteboard. Try the interactive demo in your browser with sample data, or pilot LeanSuite on your own lines for 90 days, with the setup done by our team.
What Lean Studio isFAQ
Questions about fishbone diagram
It is used to map the possible causes of one problem across several categories, so a team looks at every area before choosing where to check. It is a brainstorming and organising tool in root cause analysis. It does not prove a cause: each cause it lists still has to be checked with data.
In manufacturing the usual set is the 6Ms: Man, Machine, Method, Material, Measurement and Mother Nature (the environment). Other sets, such as the 8Ps for services, exist. The names are prompts, so you can replace them with the steps of your own process if that makes the team think of more causes.
Write a specific problem statement in a box at the head, draw a spine and a bone for each category, brainstorm causes onto the bones, go one level deeper on promising ones, then vote for the most likely and write a check, an owner and a date for each. Mark each cause confirmed or cleared when the check is done.
A fishbone spreads out across many categories of cause, and the 5 Whys follows one chain of cause downward. Use the fishbone when the problem could come from several areas. Use the 5 Whys when the cause looks like a single chain, or to take one confirmed cause from the fishbone to its root.
Yes. Fishbone diagram, Ishikawa diagram and cause-and-effect diagram are three names for the same tool. It is called a fishbone for its shape and an Ishikawa diagram after Kaoru Ishikawa, the Japanese quality expert who popularised it.
Related guides and tools
More method guides
- The 6 Ms of production
- Poka-yoke
- Model area 90-day plans
- Moving from Excel to one system
- Reducing machine downtime: a worked month
- Andon and jidoka
- Cycle time vs lead time, worked through
- Root cause analysis
- How many operators a line needs
- Reducing scrap and rework: a worked month
- Unsafe acts and unsafe conditions
- Just culture
- Stop-work authority
- Material review board (MRB)
- What is an NCR?
- Problem solving methods
- Quad chart
- OEE calculation
- Quality assurance vs quality control
- SOP meaning and format
- Job hazard analysis
- Near miss reporting
- Pareto chart
- Histogram
- Control chart
Or browse the topics, the full library and the lean glossary.
Rather see it on your own problem?
Bring the problem you are stuck on, and we will show you on a call how LeanSuite handles it.

