Skip to content
LeanSuite - Lean Manufacturing Software

Free template

Updated

Equipment criticality analysis

Equipment criticality analysis ranks a plant's assets by what their failure would cost in safety, quality and output, so maintenance effort goes to the ones that matter. Each asset is scored 1 to 5 on safety and environment, quality, production impact and backup, failure frequency, repair time and cost, and spare parts lead time. The scores are multiplied by weights the site sets and added up, and cut-offs the site sets turn the total into a class: A, B or C. Many sites add a safety override, so a top safety or environment score makes an asset class A whatever its total. Page 1 of this template has the weights, the cut-offs and an asset table with the weighted score, override, class, rank and strategy. Page 2 has the scoring guide, the suggested strategy for each class and a worked example. The Excel version works out the scores, classes and ranks, flags ties and overrides, suggests the strategy, sorts the assets and counts them by class.

Free to use: print it, copy it and edit it for your team. Enter your name and work email once to download.

Page 1 of the equipment criticality analysis: fields for site, date, team and who agreed the weights, a weights row for six criteria, boxes for the class A and B cut-offs and the safety override score, an asset table with scores for safety, quality, production, failure frequency, repair and spares, the weighted score, override, class, rank and strategy, and a count by class.
Six criteriaWeights the site setsWeighted scoreClass A, B or CSafety overrideRank and tiesStrategy by classScoring guide

When to use it

When to use an equipment criticality analysis

  • Before building or rebuilding a preventive maintenance program, to decide which assets get which strategy.
  • When the PM schedule has grown so big that the team cannot keep up with it.
  • To decide which spare parts to hold on site and which to order when needed.
  • To choose the first assets for reliability-centered maintenance or an FMEA.

How to fill it in

  1. 1

    Make the asset list

    Every asset that can stop, slow or endanger the operation, at the level you maintain it: a press, a conveyor, a compressor. Give each one an ID.

  2. 2

    Agree the criteria, weights and cut-offs first

    Before scoring any asset. Change the descriptors on the scoring guide to fit your site, and decide which safety score triggers the override.

  3. 3

    Score each asset as a team

    Maintenance, production, quality and safety together, with the failure history for frequency and repair time. Score the worst credible failure, with the backup that exists today.

  4. 4

    Work out the weighted score and the class

    Weighted score = the sum of weight × score over the six criteria. The cut-offs give the class, and the override makes an asset A whatever its total when its safety score reaches the trigger.

  5. 5

    Review the ranking

    Look at the borderline assets and the ties. The team can move an asset up a class, and should write down why.

  6. 6

    Set the strategy and score again

    Use the class to set the maintenance approach and the spares held. Score again when equipment, backup or the failure history changes, and at least once a year.

Strategy by class

What each criticality class usually gets

Common practice, not a rule: your site sets the cut-offs and can choose a different approach for any asset.

  • A

    In the worked example
    Score of 40 or more, or a safety score of 5
    Suggested maintenance strategy
    Preventive maintenance plus condition monitoring or predictive maintenance where the failure gives warning, critical spares on site, operator checks, first candidates for RCM or FMEA, and a root cause analysis after every failure
  • B

    In the worked example
    Score of 28 to 39
    Suggested maintenance strategy
    Time- or usage-based preventive maintenance, spares stocked according to their lead time, and the plan reviewed after any major failure
  • C

    In the worked example
    Score below 28
    Suggested maintenance strategy
    Run to failure can be acceptable when a failure is safe and cheap to put right, with basic cleaning, lubrication and checks; look again if the failures add up

A filled-in example

Illustrative, not a benchmark

An example: ten assets in a stamping and welding plant. Weights are 3 for safety and environment and for production impact, 2 for quality and failure frequency, 1 for repair and spares, so the highest possible score is 60 (illustrative numbers).

  • Stamping press P2, the bottleneck, scores 3, 4, 5, 4, 4 and 4: 9 + 8 + 15 + 8 + 4 + 4 = 48. Class A, rank 1.
  • Paint line oven 44 and robot weld cell W1 40: class A, which starts at 40.
  • Blanking press P1 39 and leak test station T1 30: class B. P1 is one point under A, so the team will look at it again after its next failure.
  • Overhead crane C1 scores 32, class B on its total, but its safety and environment score is 5, so the override makes it class A.
  • Air compressor AC1, which has a standby unit, 27; assembly conveyor 26; parts washer 24; ventilation fan 14: class C.

4 class A (one of them by the safety override), 2 class B and 4 class C. The A assets get condition monitoring and critical spares, the crane's safety inspections come first, and the C assets keep basic care and can run to failure.

Common mistakes

  • Scoring every asset high

    If most assets end up in class A, the ranking cannot set priorities. Score the worst credible failure, not the worst imaginable one, and check the spread.

  • Ignoring the backup

    A standby compressor or spare capacity changes the production impact. Score each asset as the plant is today, with the backup that exists.

  • Changing the weights after scoring

    Weights adjusted to put a particular asset in class A make the ranking meaningless. Agree weights and cut-offs before the first score.

  • Doing it once

    New equipment, a removed backup or a run of failures changes an asset's class. Score again when they change, and at least once a year.

Download the template

Free to use: print it, copy it and edit it for your team. Enter your name and work email once to download.

Run this template in LeanSuite

In LeanSuite, professional maintenance tags log each breakdown with its start and end times, build a searchable repair history for every asset, and show MTTR and MTBF by machine or line in built-in dashboards so you can find your worst-performing assets.

FAQ

Equipment criticality analysis: common questions

More free templates

All templates

Can't find the template you need?

Tell us what you're looking for. We'll make it and send it to your inbox, free.

A shift handover sheet, a red tag log, a changeover checklist for one machine: if your team uses it on the floor, ask.

By sending this form you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.