Skip to content
LeanSuite - Lean Manufacturing Software

Free template

Updated

Professional maintenance (PM) 90-day model area plan

A professional maintenance model area plan is a 90-day plan for proving, on one machine, that the maintenance team can analyse every breakdown, restore the machine, fix its weak points and keep it running with a planned maintenance system, before the system spreads to other machines. Professional maintenance is also called the planned maintenance pillar. The team builds the equipment record, analyses past breakdowns by cause, restores basic conditions and deterioration, puts countermeasures on weak points, ranks the components and chooses how each is maintained, writes the PM tasks, sets up critical spares and runs a PM calendar. This template has the 13-week plan as a Gantt chart in three phases with the owner, deliverable and done-when of each activity, a scoring table to choose the model machine from loss data, the team, a KPI board, the day-90 gate, and the expansion plan for months 4 to 12 in three waves, with a worked example.

Free to use: print it, copy it and edit it for your team. Enter your name and work email once to download.

Page 1 of the professional maintenance 90-day model area plan: a 13-week Gantt chart in three phases with the owner, deliverable and done-when of each activity, from breakdown analysis to the day-90 gate.
13-week Gantt planBreakdown analysis to PM calendarModel machine scoringTeam rolesKPI boardDay-90 gateExpansion wavesWorked example

When to use it

When to use a professional maintenance 90-day plan

  • When maintenance spends most of its time on breakdowns and the plant wants to prove planned maintenance on one machine first.
  • When PM tasks exist but breakdowns still repeat, and nobody is sure the tasks match how the machine fails.
  • When a bottleneck or critical machine needs a reliability plan its sponsor can follow week by week.
  • When autonomous maintenance is running on a machine and maintenance needs its side of the work planned to match.

How to fill it in

  1. 1

    Choose the model machine from loss data

    Score up to three candidate machines (five in Excel) on loss data, visibility, team willingness and repeatability, from 1 to 3. Loss data here means breakdowns, downtime hours, repair cost and repeat failures. Pick the highest total; on a tie, the higher loss data score wins.

  2. 2

    Name the team and write day 1

    Sponsor, pillar lead, the maintenance planner and technicians, and the area supervisor and an operator for downtime windows and the link to autonomous maintenance. In Excel, day 1 and the status date set the dates and status of every activity.

  3. 3

    Set the baseline and the day-90 targets

    Breakdowns a week, MTBF, MTTR, PM compliance and the share of breakdowns with a finished analysis, from the work order or downtime log.

  4. 4

    Run the 13 weeks and update the plan every week

    Move a bar if your machine needs it, write the week each activity really finished, and add one actual per KPI each week. Late activities turn red in the Excel version.

  5. 5

    Pass the day-90 gate

    The sponsor and pillar lead check the six gate items with evidence. If one is not met, fix it before any other machine starts.

  6. 6

    Plan the expansion waves

    Wave 1 goes to machines of the same type or with the same critical components, with model area technicians running the first breakdown analyses in each. Each new machine runs its own 13 weeks against its own baseline.

The 90-day plan

Week by week: from breakdown analysis to the PM calendar

The standard plan printed on page 1 and in the Excel version. Days 1 to 30 are weeks 1 to 4, days 31 to 60 weeks 5 to 9 and days 61 to 90 weeks 10 to 13. Move the weeks to fit your machine.

  • 1

    Activity
    Choose the model machine and form the team (Setup)
    Owner
    Pillar lead
    Deliverable
    Team list; machine chosen with the selection table
    Done when
    Team named, sponsor agreed, first meeting held
  • 1 to 2

    Activity
    Measure the baseline and build the equipment record (Step 1)
    Owner
    Maintenance planner
    Deliverable
    Breakdowns, MTBF, MTTR, PM compliance; component list and history
    Done when
    Every KPI on the board has a baseline
  • 2 to 4

    Activity
    Breakdown analysis of past failures (Step 1)
    Owner
    Maintenance technician
    Deliverable
    One analysis per breakdown: what happened, why-why, cause type
    Done when
    Each breakdown in the period is classed by cause
  • 3 to 6

    Activity
    Restore basic conditions and deterioration (Step 2)
    Owner
    Maintenance technician
    Deliverable
    Repairs from the analysis and the operators' tags; worn parts replaced
    Done when
    Worn parts restored; cleaning, lubrication and tightening in place
  • 4 to 7

    Activity
    Countermeasures for weak points (Step 2)
    Owner
    Model area team
    Deliverable
    A countermeasure per cause, copied to similar parts on the machine
    Done when
    No repeat breakdown from a cause already analysed
  • 5 to 7

    Activity
    Rank the components and choose the maintenance type (Step 3)
    Owner
    Maintenance planner
    Deliverable
    Components classed A, B or C with time-based, condition-based or run to failure
    Done when
    Every component has a maintenance type and a reason
  • 6 to 9

    Activity
    Write the PM tasks (Step 4)
    Owner
    Maintenance technician
    Deliverable
    Task, interval, method, standard time, parts and lockout points
    Done when
    Every A and B component has a task
  • 7 to 9

    Activity
    Set up the critical spares (Step 4)
    Owner
    Maintenance planner
    Deliverable
    Spares list with minimum and maximum stock
    Done when
    Each critical spare is listed and in stock
  • 9 to 10

    Activity
    Build the PM calendar (Step 4)
    Owner
    Maintenance planner
    Deliverable
    Tasks by week for a year, windows agreed with production
    Done when
    A year of tasks loaded and the first weeks agreed
  • 10 to 13

    Activity
    Run the calendar and track PM compliance (Step 4)
    Owner
    Maintenance planner
    Deliverable
    Weekly PM compliance and an analysis of each new breakdown
    Done when
    PM done as scheduled and every new breakdown analysed
  • 11 to 12

    Activity
    Split the tasks between operators and maintenance (Link to AM)
    Owner
    Pillar lead
    Deliverable
    Who checks what: operator checks and maintenance tasks
    Done when
    Each check has one owner and nothing falls between
  • 13

    Activity
    Day-90 review and decision to expand (Gate)
    Owner
    Sponsor
    Deliverable
    Day-90 gate sheet, KPIs against baseline, lessons
    Done when
    Gate signed by the sponsor and the pillar lead

What's on the gates

The day-90 gate and the wave gate for professional maintenance

The day-90 gate decides whether the model area is ready to be copied; the wave gate is checked for each new area before the next wave starts. Both are on page 3 of the PDF and on the Excel version's Day-90 gate and Expansion sheets.

Day-90 gate

All met before the first expansion wave starts

  1. 1Every breakdown since day 1 has a finished analysis and a countermeasure
  2. 2Basic conditions are restored and the weak points have countermeasures
  3. 3Every A and B component has a PM task, and critical spares are in stock
  4. 4The PM calendar is running and PM compliance is reviewed every week
  5. 5The KPI board has 13 weeks of data against the baseline
  6. 6The equipment record, PM tasks and lessons are written up so another team can copy them

Wave gate

For each new area, before the next wave starts

  1. 7The area passed the same day-90 gate as the model area
  2. 8Its KPIs are measured against its own baseline, not the model area's
  3. 9The PM tasks and lessons were copied and adapted to the machine, and the copy is recorded
  4. 10Coaches for the next wave are named and have run a session with the pillar lead watching
  5. 11The model area was audited again and still holds its standard

A filled-in example

Illustrative, not a benchmark

An example: a corrugated box plant (illustrative, with made-up numbers; the same as page 4 of the PDF and the Excel example sheets). Not a benchmark.

  • Model machine choice, loss data, visibility, team willingness and repeatability scored 1 to 3: Corrugator scored 10, Flexo folder gluer 2 scored 11 and Die cutter 1 scored 8. Folder gluer 2 scored 11 against 10 for the corrugator: both have heavy breakdown losses, but the folder gluer team asked for the change and two more of the same model run in the plant. The corrugator went into wave 2 with its own shutdown plan.
  • Breakdowns on the model machine: baseline 4 a week, day-90 target 1 a week, week 13 actual 1 a week, 100% of the gap closed.
  • MTBF: baseline 42 hours, day-90 target 160 hours, week 13 actual 120 hours, 66% of the gap closed.
  • MTTR: baseline 95 minutes, day-90 target 60 minutes, week 13 actual 70 minutes, 71% of the gap closed.
  • PM compliance: baseline 55%, day-90 target 95%, week 13 actual 91%, 90% of the gap closed.
  • Breakdowns analysed: baseline 10%, day-90 target 100%, week 13 actual 100%, 100% of the gap closed.

The team passed the day-90 gate in week 13. Wave 1 (months 4 to 6) went to Flexo folder gluers 1 and 3, wave 2 (months 7 to 9) to Die cutters 1 and 2, corrugator, and wave 3 (months 10 to 12) to Boiler, air compressors, with a model area team member coaching each wave 1 area.

Common mistakes

  • Writing PM tasks before restoring the machine

    Tasks written for a worn machine plan around the wear. Restore basic conditions and fix the weak points first, then set the intervals.

  • Analysing only the big breakdowns

    Short, repeated failures often cost more in total. Analyse every breakdown on the model machine, and class each one by cause.

  • Treating every component the same

    Rank the components first. Critical ones get time-based or condition-based tasks; some can run to failure if a spare is on the shelf.

  • A calendar production never agreed to

    PM that keeps getting bumped trains everyone to ignore it. Agree the windows with production before the calendar starts, and track compliance weekly.

  • Spreading before the gate

    Copying PM tasks to other machines before the model machine shows fewer breakdowns spreads unproven intervals. Hold the gate, then expand in waves.

Download the template

Free to use: print it, copy it and edit it for your team. Enter your name and work email once to download.

Run this template in LeanSuite

In LeanSuite each breakdown is logged as an emergency work order (EWO): downtime and MTTR are worked out from its start and end times, the repair and parts are recorded, breakdowns are classified by root-cause category with repeat failures spotted by failure curve analysis, and an EWO that needs a lasting fix becomes a Kaizen.

FAQ

Professional maintenance (PM) 90-day model area plan: common questions

More free templates

All templates

Can't find the template you need?

Tell us what you're looking for. We'll make it and send it to your inbox, free.

A shift handover sheet, a red tag log, a changeover checklist for one machine: if your team uses it on the floor, ask.

By sending this form you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.