Skip to content

Free template

Updated

ISO 9001 management review kit

An ISO 9001 management review is where top management checks, at planned intervals, that the quality management system is still suitable, adequate and effective. Clause 9.3 lists the inputs the review looks at and the results it must decide, and asks for documented information as evidence. This free kit gives you a 90-minute agenda with 14 inputs, a data sheet for owners to fill in beforehand, minutes laid out by decision, an action log and a worked example. The Excel version works out the next review due, flags an overdue review, checks that each input has an owner, source, target and evidence, and counts days open and overdue on actions. It uses the clause 9.3 requirements of ISO 9001:2015 and marks the changes reported for ISO 9001:2026, published on 16 September 2026. The kit paraphrases the standard and does not make anyone certified or compliant.

Free to use: print it, copy it and edit it for your team. Enter your name and work email once to download.

Page 1 of the ISO 9001 management review kitThe heading, then how to run the review in one page under When, Who, How long, Before, During and After, what the output has to record, and a note on which edition of the standard the kit follows.
90-minute agenda14 inputs with ownersData sheetMinutes by decisionAction logNext review dueCompleteness checkOverdue flagsWorked exampleSources

When to use it

When to use a management review kit

  • When it is time for the review you planned: the Excel Plan sheet shows the next date and warns you when it is overdue.
  • When your last minutes say reviewed and discussed, and an auditor or your own team wants to see decisions, owners and dates.
  • When you run the review through your regular meetings and need to make sure every input lands in one of them.
  • When you move to the 2026 edition and want to see which inputs were added or split.
  • When a new plant manager or quality manager takes over the review and needs one agenda to start from.

How to fill it in

  1. 1

    Set the interval

    ISO 9001 does not say how often. Pick a gap that fits your plant, write it on the Plan sheet and enter the dates of past reviews.

  2. 2

    Send the data sheet two weeks ahead

    Each owner gets their row: the last value, the target, the trend over several periods and where the evidence is kept.

  3. 3

    Check the Inputs sheet a week ahead

    The check column says which rows still miss an owner, source, value, target or evidence. Chase those first.

  4. 4

    Run the agenda

    Take the items in order, ask the question printed beside each one, and keep to the times. Move the times to suit you, but cover every item or note where else it was covered.

  5. 5

    Write decisions, not discussion

    Record each decision under improvement opportunities, changes to the quality system or resource needs. A decision of no change counts when you write it down.

  6. 6

    Raise each action with an owner and a date

    Put them on the Actions sheet. Days open and days overdue work themselves out.

  7. 7

    Keep the minutes and the data sheet

    They are your documented information of the review. Open the next review with the overdue actions.

The agenda

The 14 inputs and 3 decisions, with time

Clause references follow the 2015 order. Items marked 2026 are reported as added or split in ISO 9001:2026; keep them in the review under either edition.

  • 1. Status of actions from earlier reviews

    What to bring
    Every action from the last review: owner, due date, done or not, and why if not.
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 a
    Minutes
    6
  • 2. Changes in external and internal issues relevant to the QMS

    What to bring
    What changed since the last review: customers, regulations, markets, suppliers, technology, people, equipment, sites.
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 b
    Minutes
    4
  • 3. Changes in the needs and expectations of interested parties (2026)

    What to bring
    New or changed requirements from customers, regulators, owners, employees and suppliers.
    Clause (2015)
    4.2 in 2015
    Minutes
    4
  • 4. Customer satisfaction and feedback

    What to bring
    Complaints, returns, customer scorecards, survey results and praise, as a trend over several periods.
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 c 1
    Minutes
    7
  • 5. Extent to which quality objectives are met

    What to bring
    Each quality objective with its target, the actual and the trend.
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 c 2
    Minutes
    6
  • 6. Process performance and conformity of products and services

    What to bring
    On-time delivery, first pass yield, scrap, rework and the process measures that show whether product meets requirements.
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 c 3
    Minutes
    7
  • 7. Nonconformities and corrective actions

    What to bring
    Nonconformities by cause, repeats, and corrective actions opened, overdue and closed.
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 c 4
    Minutes
    6
  • 8. Monitoring and measurement results

    What to bring
    Inspection and test results, process checks, gauge calibration status.
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 c 5
    Minutes
    4
  • 9. Audit results

    What to bring
    Internal audit findings by grade, customer and certification audit results, findings still open.
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 c 6
    Minutes
    5
  • 10. Performance of external providers

    What to bring
    Supplier delivery and quality results, supplier corrective actions, outsourced process performance.
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 c 7
    Minutes
    5
  • 11. Adequacy of resources

    What to bring
    People, skills, equipment, infrastructure and budget against what the objectives need.
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 d
    Minutes
    5
  • 12. Effectiveness of actions taken on risks

    What to bring
    For each action taken on a risk: did it work, and what is the evidence?
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 e
    Minutes
    4
  • 13. Effectiveness of actions taken on opportunities (2026)

    What to bring
    For each opportunity pursued: did it deliver, and what is the evidence?
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 e
    Minutes
    4
  • 14. Opportunities for improvement

    What to bring
    Gaps and ideas that came out of items 1 to 13, plus suggestions and improvement events.
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.2 f
    Minutes
    4
  • O1. Decide: opportunities for improvement

    What to bring
    What will we do, who does it, by when?
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.3 a
    Minutes
    6
  • O2. Decide: any need for changes to the QMS

    What to bring
    Do policy, objectives, processes or documents need to change?
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.3 b
    Minutes
    4
  • O3. Decide: resource needs

    What to bring
    What people, equipment or money do we need, and who approves it?
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.3 c
    Minutes
    4
  • C. Read back the actions and set the next date

    What to bring
    Owners, due dates, next planned review
    Clause (2015)
    9.3.1
    Minutes
    5

A filled-in example

Illustrative, not a benchmark

An example (illustrative): Example Plant is a fictional site and every number is invented. PDF page 6 and the Excel Example sheet hold the same review.

  • Timing: previous review 18 June 2026, this one 15 September 2026, so 89 days apart against a 90-day interval. Next review due 14 December 2026.
  • Inputs: on-time delivery 94.1% against a 96% target, first pass yield 97.2% against 98%, scrap 1.9% against 1.5%, 9 complaints against 6 at the last review, 31 NCRs with 3 repeats, 2 gauges past calibration, 2 of 11 key suppliers below 90% on time, 2 operators short on nights.
  • Decisions: repeat the changeover event on lines 1 and 3 and check standard work on the new shift (improvement), add a customer's energy data request to contract review (QMS change), hire two night operators and recalibrate two gauges (resources).
  • Six actions go on the log, each with an owner and a date.

One week before the meeting the Inputs check showed 12 of 14 inputs complete: item 3 had no evidence yet and item 10 had no target. On 21 October 2026 the Actions sheet shows one action overdue by 5 days (the gauge recalibration), one due within 7 days and one closed on time. The review was held 89 days after the last one, inside the 90-day interval.

Common mistakes

  • Minutes that say reviewed and discussed

    A line like that records no decision, owner or date. Write what was decided, by whom, by when.

  • A snapshot instead of a trend

    The 2015 clause asks for performance information as trends. Bring several periods, not this month alone.

  • Skipping inputs without a note

    The standard's inputs have to be covered, though not necessarily one by one or in one meeting. Cover each, or write where it was covered.

  • No evidence behind the numbers

    A figure with no pointer to where it came from is hard to defend. The data sheet has an evidence column for that.

  • Resources never discussed

    Item 11 is the one that gets cut when time is short. It is also where decisions on people, equipment and money come from.

  • Actions with no owner or date

    They sit open until the next review. The action log counts them and flags the late ones.

Download the template

Free to use: print it, copy it and edit it for your team. Enter your name and work email once to download.

Run this template in LeanSuite

Audit results are one input to the review: LeanSuite audit management lets you build, schedule and run any shop floor audit or inspection and turn every finding into a tracked action.

See it in a 45-minute demo

FAQ

ISO 9001 management review kit: common questions

  1. The review in clause 9.3, where top management checks at planned intervals that the quality management system is still suitable, adequate and effective and in line with the organization's direction. It looks at a set of inputs, such as audit results, customer feedback and the status of earlier actions, and ends in decisions on improvements, changes to the system and resources, kept as documented information. The standard does not fix a format; minutes, the data sheet and an action log are the usual form.

  2. ISO 9001 says at planned intervals and gives no number. NQA, a certification body, notes that an annual review is common and that you decide the frequency. Pick one that fits the plant, write it down and hold to it. The Excel Plan sheet starts at 90 days, which is our placeholder, not a rule.

  3. No. The ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group says it need not be a separate meeting and the inputs need not be taken one by one, and NQA says one meeting need not cover the whole agenda. What matters is that every input is covered and the decisions are recorded.

  4. ISO published ISO 9001:2026 on 16 September 2026 and says it replaces the 2015 edition and that the clause structure is unchanged. Summaries from Advisera and Ideagen report that the review now has an input on changes in interested parties' needs and expectations, that the effectiveness of actions on risks and on opportunities are split, and that the outputs are called results. We did not buy the standard, so check the clause in your copy. Organizations certified to the 2015 edition have until 30 September 2029 to transition, according to ISO/TC 176.

  5. No. It is a set of working sheets built from public guidance, and it paraphrases the requirements. Only your certification body can speak for certification, and you need the standard itself to check the wording.

More free templates

All templates
Browse all 205 templates

Can't find the template you need?

Tell us what you're looking for. We'll make it and send it to your inbox, free.

A shift handover sheet, a red tag log, a changeover checklist for one machine: if your team uses it on the floor, ask.

By sending this form you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Pass it on

We want LeanSuite to be the best place on the internet for lean help. If this was useful, send it to someone on your team or in your network who needs it.