Skip to content
LeanSuite

Free template

Updated

Kaizen event charter template

A kaizen event charter is the agreement the sponsor and the team sign before a kaizen event starts. It says what problem the event fixes, the goal in numbers, where the process starts and stops, what the team may decide on its own, which metrics it will move from a measured baseline to a target, who is on the team, and who signs. The US EPA's Lean in Government Starter Kit lists the same parts and has the sponsor, team leader and facilitator sign before or at the start. This template is a 3-page PDF (blank charter, a filled-in example, how to write it) and an Excel workbook that works out each metric's change and the share of the gap closed at the report-out, checks the WIP and lead time targets against each other with Little's Law, flags a charter signed late or a team member who is not free for every day, and lists what is still missing.

Free to use: print it, copy it and edit it for your team. Enter your name and work email once to download.

Page 1 of the kaizen event charter templateFields for names and key dates, boxes for the problem, goal, scope and boundaries, a metrics table with baseline, target and result, a team table and four sign-off lines.
Problem and goalScope in and outBoundaries and risksMetrics from baseline to targetLittle's Law checkTeam and rolesSign-offWorked example
Filled-in Kaizen event charter template: a five-day event to cut lead time on packing line 2
The same sheet filled in with the worked example (page 2 of the PDF, illustrative numbers). Open full size (opens the picture in a new tab)

When to use it

When to write a kaizen event charter

  • Three to six weeks before a kaizen event, when the sponsor and the facilitator agree what it is for (EPA's kit holds the scoping meeting in that window).
  • Before you collect the baseline data, so everyone measures the same thing the same way.
  • When the event needs people, downtime or money from more than one department.
  • On day one to brief the team, and at the report-out to compare results with the targets.

How to fill it in

  1. 1

    Write the problem with its data

    What is wrong today and the numbers that show it, measured before the event. "Cases wait about 2 days in packing" is a problem; "packing is slow" is not.
  2. 2

    Set the goal

    From what to what, by when. One process and one goal: an event lasts days, not months.
  3. 3

    Draw the scope

    Where the process starts and ends, what is in and what is out. The out-of-scope list stops the argument on day three.
  4. 4

    Agree the boundaries

    How much the team may spend without asking, how long the line may stop each day, what it may change on its own, and what needs the sponsor. Add the risks and how you will handle them.
  5. 5

    Fill in the metrics

    Three to five measures, each with a unit, which way is better, a baseline and a target. The Excel checks each target is better than its baseline, and that the WIP and lead time targets fit together.
  6. 6

    Name the team

    People who do the work every day, plus support from maintenance, quality or engineering. Check each person is free for every day of the event and that their normal job is covered.
  7. 7

    Sign it

    Sponsor, process owner, team leader and facilitator sign before day one, and set the report-out and 30-day follow-up dates. At the report-out, fill in the results: the Excel shows the share of each gap closed.

Charter or preparation

What the charter covers, and what it leaves to the event plan

The charter is the agreement: what the event is for and its limits. Booking rooms, ordering materials and telling the shifts belong to the preparation plan, which works from the signed charter.

  • Problem and goal

    In the charter
    The problem with its data, and the goal from what to what by when
    Why it matters
    A goal in numbers can be checked at the report-out
  • Scope

    In the charter
    Start and end points, in scope and out of scope
    Why it matters
    Stops the event growing into a project
  • Boundaries

    In the charter
    Spending limit, downtime allowed, what the team may change, what needs the sponsor
    Why it matters
    The team can act during the week without waiting for approvals
  • Metrics

    In the charter
    Unit, direction, baseline, target, how measured, result
    Why it matters
    The baseline has to be measured before the event to prove the result
  • Team

    In the charter
    Roles, days free, whether each person's job is covered
    Why it matters
    A member who leaves on day 2 takes the know-how with them
  • Sign-off

    In the charter
    Sponsor, process owner, team leader, facilitator, with dates
    Why it matters
    Signing commits the people and the time

A filled-in example

Illustrative, not a benchmark

An example (illustrative): a five-day event to cut lead time through packing line 2, signed 21 days before the start. The Excel Example sheets hold the same numbers.

The example event's four measures at the report-out

  1. Lead time: 2.0 to 1.2 days (target 1.0)80%partly met
  2. Cases waiting: 120 to 70 (target 60)83%partly met
  3. First pass yield: 94% to 97% (target 98%)75%partly met
  4. Walking per pallet: 420 to 180 ft (target 200)target met

Little's Law: lead time = cases waiting ÷ cases a day

The check that the WIP and lead time targets agree.

  1. Now =120 ÷ 60= 2.0 days
  2. Target =60 ÷ 60= 1.0 day

Share of the gap between the baseline and the target closed by the report-out: lead time 2.0 to 1.2 days against a target of 1.0, 80 percent; cases waiting 120 to 70 against 60, 83 percent; first pass yield 94 to 97 percent against 98, 75 percent; walking per pallet 420 to 180 feet against 200, target met.

Every measure had a number before and a target, so the report-out is not a matter of opinion: one target met, three partly met, with the open actions on the 30-day follow-up.
  • Baseline over the last 10 shifts: lead time 2.0 days, 120 cases waiting, first pass yield 94%, 420 feet of walking per pallet. Targets: 1.0 day, 60 cases, 98%, 200 feet.
  • Little's Law check: 120 cases ÷ 60 cases a day = 2.0 days now, and 60 ÷ 60 = 1.0 day at the target, so the WIP and lead time targets agree.
  • Boundaries: up to $2,000 without asking and 4 hours of packing downtime a day, so trials run on the second shift. The warehouse and the product specs are out of scope.
  • Team: 6 in the core team (supervisor as team leader, CI engineer, two packers, a forklift driver, a maintenance technician who can give 3 of the 5 days), plus the sponsor, the process owner and a part-time quality technician.

At the report-out: lead time 1.2 days (80% of the gap closed), 70 cases waiting (83%), first pass yield 97% (75%) and 180 feet of walking per pallet (target met). One target met, three partly met, with the open actions on the 30-day follow-up.

Common mistakes

  • A scope that is too big

    "Improve the plant" is not an event. One process, one goal, one week.

  • No baseline before day one

    Without a measured starting point, the results cannot be proved at the report-out. EPA's checklist collects baseline data 3 weeks before.

  • Targets that do not fit together

    Halving WIP while throughput stays the same halves lead time too. If your targets say otherwise, an assumption is hiding: write it down.

  • No one on the team who does the work

    The people who run the process know where the waste is and have to live with the new method.

  • Team members who are not free

    Someone pulled back to the line on day 2 leaves a gap. Check the days and arrange cover before you sign.

  • An absent sponsor

    The sponsor clears obstacles during the week and comes to the report-out. In Farris's research on 51 events, management support predicted three of the five outcomes studied.

In LeanSuite

Use this as a Lean Studio board

The same method is one of the 30 ready-made board templates in Lean Studio, LeanSuite's whiteboard: Kaizen Event Report, summarize a kaizen event: before and after states, measured results, and the actions.

  • Start from the Kaizen Event Report template once the charter is agreed: before, after, results and actions on one board.
  • Fill the before panel from the charter and the after panel on the last day, with a Column Graph widget for before-and-after numbers.
  • Move the actions to a Kaizen Action Tracker board and give each an owner and a date.

Worked example · sample data

The sample report closes a changeover event on press 2. Before: an average of 42 minutes, with the die pre-heated inside the press and tools fetched from the tool room part-way through. After: 29 minutes across 12 changeovers, with the die pre-heated off-line on a stand and a changeover cart carrying every tool. Results: 13 minutes saved per changeover, and with three changeovers a day, 39 minutes of press time back each day. Three follow-up actions carry the gain: a second pre-heat stand by 30 June (T. Nguyen), the updated standard by 14 June (M. Osei), and training for the night setter by 21 June (A. Kaur). The actions moved to the kaizen action tracker, and the 30-day check was booked for the week of 7 July.

Before and after panels for a press changeover event, the measured result and three follow-up actions with owners and dates. Sample data.

Open this board in LeanSuite

Kaizen Event Report is one of the 30 ready-made boards in Lean Studio, LeanSuite's whiteboard. Try LeanSuite in your browser, or run it on your own lines for 90 days.

What Lean Studio is

How to run a Kaizen Event Report session

  1. 1Fill the before panel from the charter before the event starts: the problem, the baseline numbers and a photo of the area.
  2. 2Update the board each day of the event so the team sees the story forming, and so the report is written by the end of the last day, not the week after.
  3. 3Measure the after state the same way the before was measured, on the last day, and put both numbers side by side.
  4. 4List every follow-up action with an owner and a date, then move them to a kaizen action tracker for the 30-day follow-up.
  5. 5Present the report at the board in ten minutes to the sponsor and the area, and check the result again at 30 days.

Common mistakes

  • Before numbers estimated after the event. Measure them before, or the result cannot be trusted.
  • A report full of activities and no measured result.
  • Follow-up actions with no dates, so the gain erodes within a month.
  • Writing the report a week later, when the details have gone.
  • Not training the other shifts. An event that changed the day shift changed a third of the line.

Where it goes next in LeanSuite

  • The event runs as a Kaizen project: projected and actual savings, hard and soft, are recorded against plant targets, every action has an owner and a due date, and Presentation mode turns the project into slides for the review. Kaizen & Projects
  • Training the night setter is a skill level on the skills matrix that rises when the trainer signs off on a tablet. Competency Management

Download the template

Free to use: print it, copy it and edit it for your team. Enter your name and work email once to download.

Run this template in LeanSuite

LeanSuite manages every improvement project, from a small Kaizen event to a full DMAIC project, in one visual hub and tracks each one through to results.

See it in a 45-minute demo

FAQ

Kaizen event charter template: common questions

  1. The problem with its data, the goal from what to what by when, the scope (start, end, in and out), the boundaries the team works within, three to five metrics with a baseline and a target, the team and their roles, and the signatures. EPA's Lean in Government Starter Kit lists the same parts.

  2. EPA's kit has the sponsor, the team leader and the facilitator sign before or at the start, and its checklist gathers the signatures 3 weeks before the event. This template adds the process owner, who has to live with the new method.

  3. The Lean Lexicon describes a kaizen workshop as commonly lasting five days; EPA gives 2 to 5 days. EPA puts teams at typically 8 to 10 people and 15 at most. A narrow scope needs fewer.

  4. Each target should be better than its baseline in the right direction, and WIP, throughput and lead time should agree by Little's Law: lead time = WIP ÷ throughput. In the example, 60 cases ÷ 60 a day gives the 1-day lead time target. The Excel does both checks.

  5. A team charter sets up a standing team; a DMAIC project charter covers a Six Sigma project of several months. A kaizen event charter is for one event of a few days, so it adds the boundaries the team can act within that week and the event dates.

More free templates

All templates
Browse all 278 templates

Can't find the template you need?

Tell us what you're looking for. We'll make it and send it to your inbox, free.

A shift handover sheet, a red tag log, a changeover checklist for one machine: if your team uses it on the floor, ask.

By sending this form you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Pass it on

We want LeanSuite to be the best place on the internet for lean help. If this was useful, send it to someone on your team or in your network who needs it.